The 1931 Five Star Final Film offers a powerful look at how newspapers can both inform the public and cause serious harm. While also giving insight on multiple different topics we have learned about in journalism history.
Penny Press Influence One idea that stood out to me was how the newspaper in the film focuses on attracting a large audience. This connects to the Penny Press era. In the 1800s, newspapers like The Sun, started by Benjamin Day, were sold for a very cheap price so that more people could afford them. Because of this, newspapers started looking for stories that would interest a wide audience.
The Gazette in Five Star Final follows a similar strategy. The editor wants to publish the old story about Nancy Voorhees because he believes it will attract readers and increase sales. The story is emotional and dramatic, which makes it a strong “human interest” story. However, the newspaper does not seem to care about how the story will affect Nancy or her family.
Yellow Journalism The film also shows examples of Yellow Journalism. Yellow Journalism focuses on shocking or dramatic stories to get attention, even if it means ignoring accuracy or ethics. A clear example in the movie is when the Gazette decides to dig up Nancy Voorhees’s past crime from ten years earlier.
Nancy had already served her punishment and rebuilt her life, but the newspaper still publishes the story just to create excitement and sell more papers. The situation becomes even more unethical when a reporter pretends to be a clergyman in order to gain the family’s trust and get information. This deception shows how far the newspaper is willing to go just to get a story.
The consequences of this decision are tragic. The intense media attention leads to the suicide of Nancy and her husband. The film shows how irresponsible journalism can cause real harm to people’s lives.
Press Barons and Power Another idea from journalism history that appears in the film is the role of press barons. Press barons were powerful newspaper owners who controlled large media companies and often focused on profit and influence.
Press Barons and Power Another idea from journalism history that appears in the film is the role of press barons. Press barons were powerful newspaper owners who controlled large media companies and often focused on profit and influence.
In the movie, the character Hinchcliffe represents this type of leader. He treats the newspaper mainly as a business and does not worry about the harm caused by the story. When Randall expresses concern about publishing the story, Hinchcliffe quickly dismisses it. This shows how the people in power at newspapers can control decisions and push reporters to focus on profit rather than ethics.
Journalism Ethics The film also raises questions about journalism ethics. Journalists have responsibilities both to the people they write about and to the people who read their work. They should try to report the truth, avoid causing unnecessary harm, and respect people’s privacy when possible.
In Five Star Final, many of the characters ignore these responsibilities. Hinchcliffe clearly does not care about the ethical side of journalism. His only goal is selling newspapers. The reporter who pretends to be a clergyman also shows unethical behavior because he lies and manipulates the family to get information.
Randall is one of the few characters who seems to think about ethics. He understands that publishing the story could hurt Nancy and her family. Throughout the movie, he appears uncomfortable with what the newspaper is doing. However, even though he recognizes the ethical problem, he still follows orders and allows the story to be published.
Were the Characters Thinking About Ethics? It seems like most of the characters were not thinking very much about the ethical questions involved in their work. Hinchcliffe clearly only cares about profit and circulation. For him, the success of the newspaper is more important than the well-being of the people involved in the story.
Randall, however, does appear to struggle with these questions. His behavior shows guilt and stress, which suggests he knows the newspaper is doing something wrong. Even though he questions the decision, he ultimately goes along with it, which shows how pressure inside a newsroom can make it difficult for journalists to stand up for ethical values.
The film shows how ignoring journalistic ethics can lead to serious consequences. It reminds us that journalists have a responsibility not only to inform the public but also to think carefully about how their reporting affects real people.





